With a brand new school year upon us, parents need
to reflect on – and be thankful for -- the generosity of teachers. The
professionals with whom we entrust the intellectual and social development of our
children give more than self, time and patience to get the job done in the best
way possible – they also give a great deal of their money.
Since the dawning days of the Great Recession,
almost everything has been at one time or another on the chopping block of
school boards and administrators. Due to economic losses that had harmed their
communities, the tax cap of law and a self-imposed tax cap (you can’t increase
property taxes on financially-stressed families in today’s job market), schools
had to strike from their budgets sports, the arts, teachers’ aides and more.
One of the necessary line items that has faced such
cutbacks and constant scrutiny is “supplies”, the little things and big things
that each classroom needs to operate and inspire. In order to achieve their
personal and professional goals, and ensure that their pupils are not cheated
of the educational experience they deserve, teachers find themselves digging
deep to keep their room and students supplied. The average teacher spends a tad
under $500 of his or her money to do that every year.
Although one might consider it a job-related
expense, it’s much more than that. They are giving to the children as a whole
and also to individual children and the children’s families (teachers often find
themselves giving rudimentary personal supplies to the poorest of their
students). Such generosity needs to be
properly rewarded with tax deductions, just as all donations are.
As reasonable as that sounds, it hasn’t been
properly administered, if even at all, at the federal and state levels.
When it comes to their federal tax returns,
kindergarten-through-grade-12 teachers are allowed to deduct up to $250 of what
they paid for books, supplies, equipment, and other materials used in the
classroom.
That deduction amount is much too small. It’s only
half of the average annual expenditure. The deduction should not have a cap, or
if it must be capped, it should be as high as $1,000. Remember, $500 is only
the average, so there are many teachers spending far more than that, and it is
not unreasonable to assume that in a poor rural or inner-city district, some
teachers are spending close to $1,000 per year.
The $250 limit is not the only flaw with the
federal tax break. It’s not permanent; the original law had a 10 year life. In
every year since, it has received a one-year extension. It was one of more than
50 tax breaks that got an extension in December of last year with the Tax
Increase Prevention Act. That allowed teachers to claim the expenditures on
their 2014 filings. But, when it comes to 2015, it’s not guaranteed to be
there. It really needs permanency and certainty.
As for state income taxes, teachers cannot claim
supply purchases in New York. The Governor tried to address this earlier this
year when he floated the idea of a $200 tax credit, but he tied it in with
reforms concerning donation to private schools, which didn’t fly with
legislators. Once again, $200 doesn’t come close to the real amount that’s
spent, nor is it even in the territory of the proposal that has been offered by
Assembly Republicans the past 3 years, which would provide up to $500 in annual
tax credits.
It’s time that we afforded teachers some
recognition and public reward for their generosity which they have always been
doing without any expectation of tax credits or reimbursement. If you gave to a
church or non-profit you would expect a deduction (some folks actually won’t
give unless they are guaranteed a tax credit), so the charity of teachers to
your children should be given its due, especially when one considers that a
young teacher just starting out makes well under $40,000, has assumed thousands
of dollars of college debt and is trying to do what he or she can to make our
kids – and our community -- better.
From the 31 August 2015 Lockport Union Sun & Journal
From the 31 August 2015 Lockport Union Sun & Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment