Over the next month or two, Americans will be
subjected to a game of political football, as Congress and then the President
will have a heated back and forth over the future of the Export-Import Bank,
the charter of which is set to expire in June.
Most Americans are unfamiliar with the Bank. It
considers itself the official export credit agency of the United States and its
mission is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to
international markets. The Ex-Im Bank provides working capital guarantees
(pre-export financing); export credit insurance; and loan guarantees and direct
loans (buyer financing).
It does all of this with the full support of public
finances. If a foreign transaction falls apart or a participating American
business is hoodwinked, it’s up to the Bank (and taxpayers) to foot the bill
and make the affected company whole again.
That happens too often because the primary purpose
of the Ex-Im Bank is to assume credit and country risks that the private sector
is unable or unwilling to accept. That means if a private bank or insurance
company knows better than to back a deal, our government steps in to do it,
knowing full well the great amount of risk and lack of certainty.
Enough deals have fallen through over the 80 year
history of the Bank that American taxpayers have been on the hook for
approximately $2 billion every decade per a report issued by the Congressional
Budget Office last May.
That’s $16 billion thrown away to assume risk that
those companies should have assumed on their own. True free-market capitalism
is based on the entrepreneurial spirit of its participants…winners and losers
know the risks, assume the risks and then reap the rewards or miseries created
by the fulfillment of those risks.
But, unfortunately, that’s not the economic system
we really live in. It may be for businesses on Main Street, but the markets are
controlled by the businesses on Wall Street, entities that claim capitalistic
paths but instead choose one that finds them begging for -- and being granted –
favor from an unconstitutional federal system that meddles in markets and promotes
crony capitalism. Just look at the bailouts of the Great Recession for the best
example of that: Trillions of taxpayers’ dollars were used to prop up banks,
lending institutions and larger corporations that were weakened by their own
mass stupidity.
It’s those same businesses that are benefiting
from those same taxpayers, via the Ex-Im Bank, who are taking on all the risk
for potentially-bad business deals.
But, the Bank wants you to believe otherwise.
It makes an audacious claim that nearly 90 percent
of its more than 3,340 transactions in 2014 directly supported American small
businesses. That doesn’t tell the full story. Companies with 1,500 employees
fall into the small business category for the Bank. Although 90 percent of the
transactions went to small businesses (as mutated as that description may be), more
than three-quarters of the dollars annually are spent on their 10 largest
clients, the likes of Boeing, Caterpillar, and General Electric, all
multi-billion dollar corporations that can certainly evaluate and cover their
own risks.
The Ex-IM Bank approves $30 billion in new
commitments ever year and has a statutory lending cap of $140 billion. But some
of the Republicans who want to keep the Bank alive want that cap increased to a
whopping $175 billion by 2021.
It doesn’t matter if it’s $175 billion or a dollar
and seventy-five cents. It should not be the responsibility of the citizenry.
Business is risky and businesses themselves should assume that risk if they
want to do business.
As we saw in 2008, a world-wide recession can creep
up seemingly out of the blue. Although we are experiencing a somewhat-improving
economy in the U.S. the rest of the world is teetering on the edge of another
recession. That, coupled with a strong U.S. dollar which can really inhibit
foreign transactions, makes export-import even more of a gamble.
Let’s not repeat past bailouts this time around. Let
the Export-Import Bank die in June and force entrepreneurs to be true to their
title once again.
From the 23 March 2015 Lockport Union Sun and Journal
From the 23 March 2015 Lockport Union Sun and Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment