New Yorkers just came out of a
contentious presidential primary election. We were burdened with weeks of
advertisements on TV and radio while being subjected to countless rallies that
showed more salesmanship than statesmanship.
On April 20th, many New Yorkers
could be found wiping their brows and exclaiming, “phew! I’m glad that’s over!”
Not so fast -- voters in the Empire
State still have two more primaries to contend with!
But, we shouldn’t.
In 2009, the federal government
passed the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act which mandated
that the states have federal absentee ballots in the hands of overseas military
personnel at least 45 days before an election, ensuring that their completed
ballots could be received by local boards of elections in a timely fashion,
guaranteeing that the warriors’ voices are heard while they are off protecting
those same rights for others.
The MOVE Act has had an impact on
primary elections nationwide, because states that had theirs in the fall – like
New York with its second-Tuesday-after-Labor-Day date – could not meet federal
standards. Once the outcomes of the primaries were known, the official regular
election ballots would physically have to be in the hands of military personnel
by the third week of September. Impossible.
In 2010, since state officials
couldn’t get their act together to accommodate this rather simple and well-intentioned
law, New York was granted a waiver by the Department of Defense and held its
federal primaries in September.
The feds weren’t so kind in 2012
when a federal judge stepped in and mandated a June federal primary in the
Empire State. Because of the legislative impasse that led to that, New York
voters participated in 3 primaries – one in April for the presidential
election, one in June for federal elections and another in September for local
and state elections. The exhausted voters then had to vote for the real deal in
November.
Almost seven years after the passage
of the MOVE Act, we are no further ahead. Again this year we are saddled with 3
primaries. Because of the intent of the law (to allow access to the polls to
our servicemen and women) and the cost (the bill for the each extra primary is
$50 million to New York taxpayers), Democrat leaders in the Assembly again
passed a bill this year that would create a harmonized primary date, whereby
state and local primaries would be held on the same date as the federal
primaries – the fourth Tuesday in June. That’s a logically, philosophically and
fiscally sound premise.
But, Republican leaders in the state
Senate and the band of rogue Senate Democrats known as the Independent
Democratic Conference want nothing to do with it. In the past they argued for both the federal
and state primaries to be held on the third Tuesday in August. If that’s the
GOP’s idea of a compromise, it’s a horrid one at best: That date is not really
that far off from the current September primary and its one that sets-up boards
of election for non-compliance and potential lawsuits from the federal
government (not to mention slighting of our armed forces).
The Republicans’ proclaimed reason
for their date is a stretch. They’ve often said a June primary would disrupt
the final month of the legislative session in Albany. That’s a contorted way of
implying that they are more interested in politicking than doing the peoples’
work, that there’s no way that they could do both.
The self-preservation doesn’t end
there. The Senate’s plan, like our current September set-up, benefits those in
power and would continue to be a key driver of an incumbency rate that normally
exceeds 90% in the state legislature. Typically, incumbents remain uncontested
in primaries because they have name recognition and the support of their party
leaders – why rock the boat? Challengers from other parties, on the other hand,
aren’t afforded such a smooth ride. They typically square-off in primaries that
drain finances and energy. With the conclusion of the September primary (or
what could be an August primary), the victors don’t have the momentum or
finances (both have been wiped out) to stage an all-out war against the
incumbent in that two-month time frame. A June primary would put an end to that
mess, and afford others an equal chance at office.
Let’s hope the legislative
head-butting ends soon and the Senate and Assembly come to an agreement. If
they don’t, we will have a repeat of 2012 and 2016 – 3 primaries, millions
wasted, and an election process that disrespects those protecting our nation
and its interests abroad.
From the 02 May 2016 Greater Niagara Newspapers