Students of American history will
recall the many grievances against King George III that were called out in the
Declaration of Independence. Among them were the following:
“He has erected a multitude of New
Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out
their substance.”
“ …imposing Taxes on us without
our Consent”
“…depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury”
“He has combined with others to
subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by
our laws”
I cite
those indictments because they represent just a few that still affect us to
this day.
But,
rather than a monarch being the source of such unconscionable anguish, it is
our very own President who has been guilty of such crimes against our people.
It was
never intended to be this way.
In the
years that followed the signing of that sacred document on July 4, 1776, the
Founding Fathers utilized their newfound independence to fashion a government
that was beholden to the people (rather than a people that were beholden to the
government). Knowing full well the flaws that come with Kings, they created a
republic, and for it a Constitution that clearly called out the limited powers
and responsibilities of our federal government. In just over 1,000 words they
defined the role of the Executive – the President – someone who theoretically
replaced the role of the King, but unlike a King, had almost no powers. The
President could not make laws, create taxes and fees, and declare war – all powers
that Kings took for granted. A President’s duties were very few: He was to be
the face of our nation, the Commander in Chief of our armed forces, the
appointer of judges and ambassadors, and he was to execute the laws created by
Congress.
Although
the ultimate law of the land – the Constitution – clearly and concisely
identifies the legal role of the President, we’ve seen the office stray from
those limitations. And, despite
protestations by the Grand Old Party, this is nothing new to the office since
President Barack Obama came into power. Every President of our lifetimes has
been as despotic as kings, including alleged small government types like Ronald
Reagan. They do as they shouldn’t and do as they want, even if the end result
is not the peoples’ will.
This
addiction to centralized, unconstitutional power has become the norm and dates
back to the days of Lincoln, a man who had no consideration for the
Constitution and was painted as a hero for it. Lincoln opened the floodgates
that led to the modern and popular interpretation of the presidency that allows
Presidents to declare war (our last Constitutional war and occupation was World
War II), suspend trial by jury and exert indefinite detention, and use their
administrative offices to make regulations (which are laws), impose taxes (fees
and fines), and infringe upon the rights of the people and the sound operations
of the free markets. They have grown beyond the boundaries of their duties and
have assumed the powers that were once - and are elsewhere – bequeathed to
monarchies, doing everything, unchecked, that a Congress should, thus taking
all power away from the people and keeping it for themselves.
The
people fail to see that the ultimate power should be in their hands, through
our representative form of government. The nation was founded so that the
Congress was the most powerful branch of government. The general belief is that
all branches share equal power; this is not so -- the Executive Branch should
only be a check and a balance to an overreaching Congress, as are our courts to
both. Our nation was founded this way so that the masses were equally
represented and the development of laws and budgets came from a governing body
directly accessible to the common man and which could actually be comprised of
the common man. The rights and consent of the governed were paramount.
Yet, sadly, that is not what the people seem to want anymore. Carefully observe how the voters act in this election cycle. They want to know what the presidential candidates will do for them. They expect them to fix the economy, regulate industry, exert social mores upon the masses, assume war powers, make laws, control the Congress, create tax policy, intervene in foreign affairs, and suppress liberty in the name of security. They think the President is -- and they clamor for -- a singular power, a central office...in essence, a king.
Yet, sadly, that is not what the people seem to want anymore. Carefully observe how the voters act in this election cycle. They want to know what the presidential candidates will do for them. They expect them to fix the economy, regulate industry, exert social mores upon the masses, assume war powers, make laws, control the Congress, create tax policy, intervene in foreign affairs, and suppress liberty in the name of security. They think the President is -- and they clamor for -- a singular power, a central office...in essence, a king.
From the 29 June 2015 Lockport Union-Sun and Journal