Last month, our satellite television provider
announced a significant price increase that approached 10 percent. The wife and
I weighed our options and dropped our subscription package down a notch to the
least expensive one available. Versus the plan we were in, the new one will
save us $30 a month. That’s $30 that we can spend on our toddling daughter’s
ever-growing appetite and wardrobe.
Or, so we thought.
Or, so we thought.
Our $30 might be shrinking.
Within 2 weeks of our decision, we got word that
Albany, courtesy of Senator Kevin Parker (D-Brooklyn), was pondering the
addition of an excise tax on direct broadcast satellite services. This would not
be limited to television; it would also include internet and games -- in
essence, all products provided to customers from the likes of Dish Network and
Direct TV.
This new tax isn’t trivial. At 5 percent, it adds
up in a hurry. The average monthly pay-TV bill is $86, a number that the NPD
Group (a market research firm) figures will reach $200 per household by 2020.
So, if the tax were to go into effect today, you’d be paying an extra $52 per
year to state coffers. 7 years down the road, you’d be paying Albany $120 annually
just to watch TV.
The reason behind this proposed fee can cause one
to believe that Senator Parker must have some friends in the cable industry. He
states this surcharge is needed to level the playing field by forcing satellite
companies (in reality, their customers) to pay a government-specific fee
commensurate with that levied against cable companies. Since the dawn of
pay-TV, cable bills have been saddled with a tax approaching 5 percent. In the
case of cable, this actually makes sense. The tax in question is a franchise fee
through which the cable companies compensate the host communities for use of
public land, rights-of-way and public infrastructure.
Satellite companies shouldn’t see a similar fee
because they don’t require any of those things – the homeowner is the only one
entered in a contract with the company and it’s solely the homeowner’s property
(not public property) being used. It should also be noted that satellite
providers already pay a franchise fee of sorts (albeit to Washington) because
they transmit over a radio spectrum that is managed by -- and allegedly owned
by -- the federal government. That’s something that cable companies don’t
pay.
Parker’s bill is just another battle in a
frustrating, long war.
In the case of my family, we made a concerted
effort to save ourselves a pretty penny by choosing to do without some of our
favorite channels, only to see a nice chunk of our savings potentially skimmed
away by the government. This is nothing new to any of us: Think back to the
darkest days of the recession, a time when households across the state made
numerous cuts in their budgets in an effort to keep up with job losses or
diminished hours at work -- those savings were totally negated by school/property
taxes that went up like clockwork and the addition of $1.3 billion in new taxes
and fees instituted by the state to cover their own budget problems.
And people
wonder why it seems like we New Yorkers can never get ahead…it always one step
forward and one step, if not many more, back.
Gasport resident Bob Confer also writes for the New American magazine at TheNewAmerican.com. Follow him on Twitter @bobconfer
This column originally appeared in the 25 March 2013 Greater Niagara Newspapers
No comments:
Post a Comment