We’re 11 years removed from the 9/11 attacks and it
seems like such a different world. Or, at least, a different America. A land
once ripe with unabated liberty is one now governed by tyranny. A police state is allowed to persist under the
guise of “security” and some bastardized premise of freedom. Congress and the
Bush and Obama Administrations thought and think nothing of eavesdropping on
phone calls and emails without warrant; indefinitely detaining our people while
stripping them of their citizenship, rights and dignity; molesting men, women
and children in our airports; and stifling expression by limiting what can be
said and where whilst profiling the far-right (Constitutionalists) and far-left
(Occupy activists) as terrorists.
This isn’t just a federal issue. Following the lead of Uncle Sam (who’s also a Big Brother to all), metropolises like New York City (and its famed surveillance system and quasi-military cops) have found it attractive to do the same. And, so have smaller communities. Take Hornell for example. In a February 2011 column for this paper (http://tinyurl.com/ConferHornell) I looked at how that very small city of 9,000 created its own domestic spying program by placing 32 cameras throughout the community that were monitored 24/7 by the police department. Mind you, it’s a city where crime rates are but a fraction of the national average. So, with minimal criminal element present, just who is being observed?
This isn’t just a federal issue. Following the lead of Uncle Sam (who’s also a Big Brother to all), metropolises like New York City (and its famed surveillance system and quasi-military cops) have found it attractive to do the same. And, so have smaller communities. Take Hornell for example. In a February 2011 column for this paper (http://tinyurl.com/ConferHornell) I looked at how that very small city of 9,000 created its own domestic spying program by placing 32 cameras throughout the community that were monitored 24/7 by the police department. Mind you, it’s a city where crime rates are but a fraction of the national average. So, with minimal criminal element present, just who is being observed?
That camera system hasn’t been very popular with
local residents. That disdain, though, didn’t set any sort of precedent in city
hall. Hornell’s leaders still can’t seem to fathom rights – especially the natural
rights identified in the US Constitution – as made evident by what transpired
over the past month.
For the past 8 years, Main Street of Hornell been
frequented by a troubadour named Noah Carlton, who with guitar in hand, sings
Christian music on Saturdays and Sundays to passers-by. In August the local
Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to the mayor, saying that Carlton’s continued
presence inhibits business growth in the burgh by turning away prospective
customers and investors. So, in response to that long-simmering complaint, city
attorney Joe Pelych crafted a law that – just like post-9/11 terrorism efforts
- uses one incident to justify government actions that would wipe out over 200
years of civilized liberty. Under the proposed law, the city would provide “a
designated public forum for individuals and groups to exercise their free
speech rights." It said that "it shall be unlawful for any individual
or group of individuals to gather, remain, walk or stand upon any given street
or sidewalk in the City of Hornell to protest, support or exercise free speech
by voice, sign or any other means unless they are in the designated area as
defined by law." To that end, it required that anyone interested in
speaking in that area needed to first file an application with the Mayor’s
office and that they could not use voice amplifiers unless authorized. Violators
would have been hit with $250 in fines or 15 days in jail.
Basically, the law would have abridged the freedom
of speech to the point that any parties in disagreement with the government
would first have to petition that government for the right to peaceful assembly
in protest of that government in a public setting. The Council could, at its
whim, deny assembly and arrest anyone involved in the unpermitted expression of
supposedly-free speech. Not to sound clichéd, but that’s what you’d expect out
of North Korea or Nazi Germany. The Founding Fathers must have been rolling in
their graves.
Luckily, common sense prevailed. A few dozen people
protested the rule and Mayor Shawn Hogan and his council struck the proposal in
the Law and Ordinance Committee. But, even so, they definitely had the intent
to push the law: Why did it get as far as it did, to the written stage, and not
just stay a bad idea? They even matter-of-factly compared it to the designated free
speech zones around political conventions. But, w whole city as a free (read
“restricted”) speech zone?
Don’t think that because Hornell is some far-flung
town nestled in the Southern Tier that this sort of behavior won’t affect you.
If they can broach this there, they can broach it here in Niagara and Orleans
counties or anywhere across this great land. It’s nothing unusual, either: Think
about your freedoms and liberties in Modern America. Are you better off than
you were 11 years ago?
Bob Confer is a Gasport resident and vice president of Confer
Plastics Inc. in North Tonawanda. E-mail him at bobconfer@juno.com.
------------------------------------------------------------
This column originally ran in the 17 September 2012 Greater Niagara Newspapers
------------------------------------------------------------
This column originally ran in the 17 September 2012 Greater Niagara Newspapers
No comments:
Post a Comment